• bitcoinBitcoin(BTC)$81,279.004.23%
  • ethereumEthereum(ETH)$2,641.305.67%
  • tetherTether(USDT)$1.000.05%
  • binancecoinBNB(BNB)$771.003.43%
  • rippleXRP(XRP)$1.438.27%
  • usd-coinUSDC(USDC)$1.000.03%
  • solanaSolana(SOL)$111.835.75%
  • tronTRON(TRX)$0.3381030.10%
  • zcashZcash(ZEC)$1,537.925.45%
  • Figure HelocFigure Heloc(FIGR_HELOC)$1.030.25%
  • HyperliquidHyperliquid(HYPE)$92.481.72%
  • dogecoinDogecoin(DOGE)$0.0884883.65%
  • moneroMonero(XMR)$581.928.90%
  • RainRain(RAIN)$0.0139429.06%
  • whitebitWhiteBIT Coin(WBT)$83.143.54%
  • USDSUSDS(USDS)$1.000.03%
  • chainlinkChainlink(LINK)$12.535.92%
  • cardanoCardano(ADA)$0.2273485.83%
  • leo-tokenLEO Token(LEO)$8.89-0.27%
  • stellarStellar(XLM)$0.1980376.43%
  • uniswapUniswap(UNI)$9.105.57%
  • bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash(BCH)$251.830.69%
  • Ethena USDeEthena USDe(USDE)$1.000.03%
  • nearNEAR Protocol(NEAR)$3.631.07%
  • daiDai(DAI)$1.00-0.03%
  • litecoinLitecoin(LTC)$57.995.15%
  • CantonCanton(CC)$0.1110173.66%
  • USD1USD1(USD1)$1.000.05%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche(AVAX)$9.2715.78%
  • the-open-networkGram (prev. Toncoin)(GRAM)$1.391.31%
  • hedera-hashgraphHedera(HBAR)$0.0807025.21%
  • suiSui(SUI)$0.857.04%
  • Global DollarGlobal Dollar(USDG)$1.000.00%
  • shiba-inuShiba Inu(SHIB)$0.0000051.84%
  • BittensorBittensor(TAO)$265.487.78%
  • crypto-com-chainCronos(CRO)$0.0599841.28%
  • MemeCoreMemeCore(M)$1.290.02%
  • paypal-usdPayPal USD(PYUSD)$1.000.03%
  • tether-goldTether Gold(XAUT)$4,373.520.24%
  • okbOKB(OKB)$121.366.38%
  • Circle USYCCircle USYC(USYC)$1.140.00%
  • Ripple USDRipple USD(RLUSD)$1.000.01%
  • BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity FundBlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund(BUIDL)$1.000.00%
  • Ondo US Dollar YieldOndo US Dollar Yield(USDY)$1.14-0.17%
  • aaveAave(AAVE)$142.623.97%
  • AsterAster(ASTER)$0.772.49%
  • OndoOndo(ONDO)$0.4259077.69%
  • mantleMantle(MNT)$0.625.77%
  • EthenaEthena(ENA)$0.19714220.85%
  • Pump.funPump.fun(PUMP)$0.004161-1.56%
TradePoint.io
  • Main
  • AI & Technology
  • Stock Charts
  • Market & News
  • Business
  • Finance Tips
  • Trade Tube
  • Blog
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
TradePoint.io
No Result
View All Result

Disney loses $170 million with ‘Snow White’ live action flop

February 15, 2026
in Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
Disney loses 0 million with ‘Snow White’ live action flop
ShareShareShareShareShare

After years of controversies and tepid results at the box office, Disney’s 2025 live-action “Snow White” remake has reportedly netted an approximately $170 million loss.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Paramount, California AG Rob Bonta hold advanced settlement talks: report

Ryanair CEO apologizes for comparing European airline rivals to ‘rapists’ in wild rant

Forbes reported on Tuesday that filings indicate the recent controversial live-action “Snow White” remake cost a whopping $336.5 million, yet met with low returns after years of controversy.

The outlet explained that this can be discerned thanks to the fact the movie was filmed in the United Kingdom. The U.K. has local laws which benefit films with a generous reimbursement, but come with heavy rules. As a result, Disney had to create a subsidiary company, Hidden Heart Productions, in order to film there. As a result of these local U.K.-based rules, showing expenditures that otherwise remains a closely-guarded secret for films made in the United States, Disney’s massive expenses were revealed.

“In 2023 this author revealed in Britain’s Daily Mail newspaper that by July 31, 2022 Disney had already spent a staggering $183.3 million on making Snow White even though principal photography had only just wrapped,” contributor Caroline Reid wrote. “The latest set of filings are for the year to December 31, 2024 which was less than three months before the movie debuted so should give an almost-complete picture of its costs.”

Disney’s 2025 live-action “Snow White” remake has seen a $170 million loss. Walt Disney Co.

The writer went on to emphasize, “The $336.5 million spent on Snow White is higher than the cost of Disney’s Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, its Guardians of the Galaxy Marvel movie and its live action version of Beauty and the Beast which grossed a staggering $1.3 billion in 2017.”

The United Kingdom indeed came through with a reimbursement for Disney, but the writer argued this was not enough to redeem the production.

“The $336.5 million spent on Snow White is higher than the cost of Disney’s Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, its Guardians of the Galaxy Marvel movie and its live action version of Beauty and the Beast,” Forbes reported. Walt Disney Co.
Gal Gadot as the Evil Queen and Rachel Zegler as Snow White in the film. Giles Keyte

“The U.K. government also gave Snow Whitea magic touch as it reimbursed $64.9 million (£52.3 million) of the movie’s costs. This brought its net expenses down to $271.6 million but even that wasn’t enough to give it a happy ending in theaters,” Reid quipped.

Then, with the costs of bringing the movie to theaters themselves, a new level of complexity was added to the expenses.

“The amount that theaters pay to studios is known in the trade as a rental fee and an indication of the typical level comes from film industry consultant Stephen Follows who interviewed 1,235 film professionals in 2014 and concluded that, according to studios, theaters keep 49% of the takings on average,” Reid summarized. “This research lends weight to the widely-established 50-50 split which would give Disney just $102.9 million from Snow White yielding a $168.7 million loss at the box office after deducting the $271.6 million net spending on the movie.”

“One of the biggest box office bombs in the history of the movie business, in pure dollar value terms,” OutKick reported.

“One of the biggest box office bombs in the history of the movie business, in pure dollar value terms,” OutKick said. GC Images

But beyond financial woes, the remake of the iconic film has had its fair share of cultural controversies.

In 2022, Peter Dinklage criticized Disney for remaking a “f—ing backwards story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together,” while being progressive with its casting of lead actress Rachel Zegler.

Disney then reportedly responded in 2023, at least temporarily, by replacing the dwarfs with multiracial and gender-mixed “magical creatures.” This plan was later scrapped in lieu of using computer-animated mythological dwarfs who looked like those featured in the original animated film. 

Zegler also stirred controversy by speaking ill of the original 1937 film, criticizing Israel, and posting on social media, “May Trump supporters and Trump voters and Trump himself never know peace,” adding, “F— Donald Trump.”

Disney didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Credit: Source link

ShareTweetSendSharePin

Related Posts

Paramount, California AG Rob Bonta hold advanced settlement talks: report
Business

Paramount, California AG Rob Bonta hold advanced settlement talks: report

September 18, 2026
Ryanair CEO apologizes for comparing European airline rivals to ‘rapists’ in wild rant
Business

Ryanair CEO apologizes for comparing European airline rivals to ‘rapists’ in wild rant

September 18, 2026
Inside the phony, incestuous web of woke AI ‘watchdogs’ that Anthropic claims will save us from an AI apocalypse
Business

Inside the phony, incestuous web of woke AI ‘watchdogs’ that Anthropic claims will save us from an AI apocalypse

September 18, 2026
LA Review of Books spikes interview with pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai
Business

LA Review of Books spikes interview with pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai

September 18, 2026
Next Post
Software Selloff Continues as AI-Impact Worries Grow | Bloomberg Tech 2/11/2026

Software Selloff Continues as AI-Impact Worries Grow | Bloomberg Tech 2/11/2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

No Result
View All Result
Bitwise XRP ETF: The Institutional Demand Is Real. The Price Signal Isn't

Bitwise XRP ETF: The Institutional Demand Is Real. The Price Signal Isn't

September 14, 2026
Jamie Raskin says Democrats need midterm ‘landslide’ that is ‘too big to rig’: Full interview

Jamie Raskin says Democrats need midterm ‘landslide’ that is ‘too big to rig’: Full interview

September 16, 2026
Republicans navigate whether to attend GOP midterm convention in Dallas

Republicans navigate whether to attend GOP midterm convention in Dallas

September 15, 2026

About

Learn more

Our Services

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Bloggers

Learn more

Article Links

Contact

Advertise

Ask us anything

©2020- TradePoint.io - All rights reserved!

Tradepoint.io, being just a publishing and technology platform, is not a registered broker-dealer or investment adviser. So we do not provide investment advice. Rather, brokerage services are provided to clients of Tradepoint.io by independent SEC-registered broker-dealers and members of FINRA/SIPC. Every form of investing carries some risk and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. “Tradepoint.io“, “Instant Investing” and “My Trading Tools” are registered trademarks of Apperbuild, LLC.

This website is operated by Apperbuild, LLC. We have no link to any brokerage firm and we do not provide investment advice. Every information and resource we provide is solely for the education of our readers. © 2020 Apperbuild, LLC. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Main
  • AI & Technology
  • Stock Charts
  • Market & News
  • Business
  • Finance Tips
  • Trade Tube
  • Blog
  • Shop

© 2023 - TradePoint.io - All Rights Reserved!