• bitcoinBitcoin(BTC)$83,928.00-2.89%
  • ethereumEthereum(ETH)$2,657.46-3.22%
  • tetherTether(USDT)$1.00-0.01%
  • binancecoinBNB(BNB)$763.75-3.25%
  • rippleXRP(XRP)$1.49-4.18%
  • usd-coinUSDC(USDC)$1.00-0.01%
  • solanaSolana(SOL)$114.14-2.77%
  • tronTRON(TRX)$0.338639-0.62%
  • zcashZcash(ZEC)$1,530.42-0.94%
  • Figure HelocFigure Heloc(FIGR_HELOC)$1.030.43%
  • HyperliquidHyperliquid(HYPE)$92.77-2.99%
  • dogecoinDogecoin(DOGE)$0.092191-7.27%
  • moneroMonero(XMR)$549.39-4.18%
  • whitebitWhiteBIT Coin(WBT)$84.26-2.81%
  • USDSUSDS(USDS)$1.00-0.02%
  • chainlinkChainlink(LINK)$12.23-5.89%
  • cardanoCardano(ADA)$0.238075-4.43%
  • RainRain(RAIN)$0.012446-7.08%
  • leo-tokenLEO Token(LEO)$8.97-0.01%
  • stellarStellar(XLM)$0.202990-4.95%
  • bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash(BCH)$351.307.59%
  • uniswapUniswap(UNI)$9.12-0.87%
  • nearNEAR Protocol(NEAR)$4.25-3.91%
  • Ethena USDeEthena USDe(USDE)$1.00-0.01%
  • litecoinLitecoin(LTC)$60.25-2.94%
  • daiDai(DAI)$1.00-0.01%
  • avalanche-2Avalanche(AVAX)$10.25-7.44%
  • USD1USD1(USD1)$1.00-0.01%
  • CantonCanton(CC)$0.108053-4.36%
  • the-open-networkGram (prev. Toncoin)(GRAM)$1.41-2.28%
  • hedera-hashgraphHedera(HBAR)$0.090120-6.03%
  • suiSui(SUI)$0.96-4.26%
  • BittensorBittensor(TAO)$292.56-6.31%
  • shiba-inuShiba Inu(SHIB)$0.000006-6.36%
  • Global DollarGlobal Dollar(USDG)$1.000.00%
  • crypto-com-chainCronos(CRO)$0.061721-7.41%
  • paypal-usdPayPal USD(PYUSD)$1.00-0.01%
  • MemeCoreMemeCore(M)$1.21-7.03%
  • tether-goldTether Gold(XAUT)$4,285.06-1.20%
  • BitwayBitway(BTW)$0.9815.58%
  • okbOKB(OKB)$118.34-3.15%
  • Circle USYCCircle USYC(USYC)$1.140.01%
  • Ripple USDRipple USD(RLUSD)$1.000.00%
  • BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity FundBlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund(BUIDL)$1.000.00%
  • Ondo US Dollar YieldOndo US Dollar Yield(USDY)$1.150.23%
  • aaveAave(AAVE)$139.57-2.46%
  • mantleMantle(MNT)$0.65-1.20%
  • EthenaEthena(ENA)$0.2088801.27%
  • OndoOndo(ONDO)$0.415667-3.16%
  • Pump.funPump.fun(PUMP)$0.004025-10.87%
TradePoint.io
  • Main
  • AI & Technology
  • Stock Charts
  • Market & News
  • Business
  • Finance Tips
  • Trade Tube
  • Blog
  • Shop
No Result
View All Result
TradePoint.io
No Result
View All Result

Feds scrutinize $5 billion in unusual Kalshi trades amid ‘wash trading’ concerns

September 23, 2026
in Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
Feds scrutinize  billion in unusual Kalshi trades amid ‘wash trading’ concerns
ShareShareShareShareShare

The federal government is scrutinizing unusual trading activity on Kalshi after billions of dollars worth of near-identical crypto trades raised questions about possible “wash trading,” according to a report.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Classic Bay Area tourist attraction closing after nearly 60 years

Florida Chamber gives JB Pritzker ‘runner-up’ for ‘Economic Developer of the Year’ award on Chicago billboards

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is examining the trades before determining whether to open an enforcement investigation, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a person familiar with the matter.

The scrutiny comes after more than $5 billion worth of ether trades clustered around $5,500 over the past month, according to the Journal.

Kalshi is facing scrutiny over billions of dollars in unusual crypto trades that have raised questions about possible “wash trading.” REUTERS

The activity has fueled questions about possible “wash trading” — transactions in which a single market player simultaneously buys and sells the same asset to create the false impression of market activity.

Kalshi has denied finding evidence of wash trading, telling the Journal that the trades were genuine and reflected incentives designed to provide liquidity in its fledgling perpetual-futures markets.

The company has also said wash trading is explicitly prohibited under its rules.

“We have not been contacted by the CFTC and don’t believe there is any formal examination,” Elisabeth Diana, a spokesperson for Kalshi, told The Post.

“As we’ve said, these data patterns are typical of liquidity incentive programs and common in financial markets. Don’t believe everything you read on X, a lot of the discourse was rumors seeded by competitors.”

Meanwhile, a Sept. 21 working paper posted online by an author using the name “OctopusTakopi” alleged that unusual trading patterns on Kalshi’s perpetual futures markets showed characteristics associated with wash trading.

Company co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara pose at Kalshi in Manhattan, Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024. EMMY PARK

The paper analyzed 4.1 million publicly reported Kalshi trades worth roughly $11.5 billion between Sept. 5 and Sept. 18, comparing them with hundreds of millions of trades on Binance, Bybit and Hyperliquid.

It found that about half of Kalshi’s perpetual futures volume during the period was concentrated in a handful of repetitive, fixed-dollar trade sizes.

The researcher also identified similarly concentrated activity in Kalshi’s bitcoin market, where trades of roughly $5,000 and $2,500 accounted for 57% of volume.

Together, those three clusters represented about $5.87 billion — or 51% of the $11.5 billion in Kalshi perpetual futures volume analyzed by the researchers.

Similar fixed-dollar trading patterns appeared in 17 of the 20 Kalshi perpetual contracts that traded during the period, according to the paper.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is examining unusual trading activity on Kalshi before determining whether to open an enforcement investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal. JHVEPhoto – stock.adobe.com

The researchers said the pattern dates back to shortly after Kalshi launched the contracts in June.

In one particularly unusual episode, the researchers found that the dominant trade sizes in Kalshi’s bitcoin and ether markets changed almost simultaneously on Aug. 24.

Bitcoin trades shifted from roughly $4,000 and $2,100 to $5,000 and $2,500, while the dominant ether size changed from roughly $4,500 to $5,500.

The changes occurred within about 10 seconds of one another, according to timestamps analyzed in the paper.

The author wrote in the paper that the synchronized switch was consistent with a single operator changing trading parameters across both markets, though the publicly available data do not reveal trader identities and therefore cannot establish who was responsible.

Credit: Source link

ShareTweetSendSharePin

Related Posts

Classic Bay Area tourist attraction closing after nearly 60 years
Business

Classic Bay Area tourist attraction closing after nearly 60 years

September 23, 2026
Florida Chamber gives JB Pritzker ‘runner-up’ for ‘Economic Developer of the Year’ award on Chicago billboards
Business

Florida Chamber gives JB Pritzker ‘runner-up’ for ‘Economic Developer of the Year’ award on Chicago billboards

September 23, 2026
Speculation about Bari Weiss’ future is coming to a head — here’s what well-placed sources say
Business

Speculation about Bari Weiss’ future is coming to a head — here’s what well-placed sources say

September 22, 2026
Kara Swisher to ditch CNN ASAP after Paramount-WBD settlement
Business

Kara Swisher to ditch CNN ASAP after Paramount-WBD settlement

September 22, 2026
Next Post
People try to flee as mudslide engulfs a border crossing

People try to flee as mudslide engulfs a border crossing

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

No Result
View All Result
Norman concedes after loss to Graham in S.C. Senate race

Norman concedes after loss to Graham in S.C. Senate race

September 23, 2026
ICE agents detain more than 100 people in Memphis

ICE agents detain more than 100 people in Memphis

September 20, 2026
What the jury could decide in Clancy murder trial

What the jury could decide in Clancy murder trial

September 22, 2026

About

Learn more

Our Services

Legal

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Bloggers

Learn more

Article Links

Contact

Advertise

Ask us anything

©2020- TradePoint.io - All rights reserved!

Tradepoint.io, being just a publishing and technology platform, is not a registered broker-dealer or investment adviser. So we do not provide investment advice. Rather, brokerage services are provided to clients of Tradepoint.io by independent SEC-registered broker-dealers and members of FINRA/SIPC. Every form of investing carries some risk and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. “Tradepoint.io“, “Instant Investing” and “My Trading Tools” are registered trademarks of Apperbuild, LLC.

This website is operated by Apperbuild, LLC. We have no link to any brokerage firm and we do not provide investment advice. Every information and resource we provide is solely for the education of our readers. © 2020 Apperbuild, LLC. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Main
  • AI & Technology
  • Stock Charts
  • Market & News
  • Business
  • Finance Tips
  • Trade Tube
  • Blog
  • Shop

© 2023 - TradePoint.io - All Rights Reserved!