Google caused controversy among some developers this weekend and today, Monday, February 23rd, after restricting their usage of its new Antigravity “vibe coding” platform, alleging “maliciously usage.”
Some users who had been using the open source autonomous AI agent OpenClaw in conjunction with agents built on Antigravity, as well as those who had connected OpenClaw agents to their Gmails, claimed on social media that they lost access to their Google accounts.
According to Google, said users had been using Antigravity to access a larger number of Gemini tokens via third-party platforms like OpenClaw, which overwhelmed the system for other Antigravity customers.
This move has cut off several users, underscoring the architectural and trust issues that can arise with OpenClaw. The timing of Google’s crackdown is particularly pointed. Just one week ago, on February 15, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger had joined OpenAI to lead its “next generation of personal agents.” While OpenClaw remains an open-source project under an independent foundation, it is now financially backed and strategically guided by Google’s primary rival.
By cutting off OpenClaw’s access to Antigravity, Google isn’t just protecting its server load; it is effectively severing a pipeline that allows an OpenAI-adjacent tool to leverage Google’s most advanced Gemini models.
Google DeepMind engineer and former CEO and founder of Windsurf, Varun Mohan, said in an X post that the company noticed “malicious usage” that led to service degradation.
“We’ve been seeing a massive increase in malicious usage of the Antigravity backend that has tremendously degraded the quality of service for our users. We needed to find a path to quickly shut off access to these users that are not using the product as intended. We understand that a subset of these users were not aware that this was against our ToS [Terms of Service] and will get a path for them to come back on but we have limited capacity and want to be fair to our actual users,” the post said.
A Google DeepMind spokesperson told VentureBeat that the move is not to permanently ban the use of Antigravity to access third-party platforms, but to align its use with the platform’s terms of service.
Unsurprisingly, Google’s move has caused a furor among OpenClaw users, including from OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger, who announced that OpenClaw will remove Google support as a result.
Infrastructure and connection uncertainty
OpenClaw emerged as a way for individual users to run shell commands and access local files, fulfilling a major promise of AI agents: efficiently running workflows for users.
But, as VentureBeat has frequently pointed out, it can often run into security and guardrail issues. There are companies building ways for enterprise customers to access OpenClaw securely and with a governance layer, though OpenClaw is so new that we should expect more announcements soon.
However, Google’s move was not framed as a security issue but rather as one of access and runtime, further showing that there is still significant uncertainty when users want to bring in something like OpenClaw into their workflow.
This is not the first time developers and power users of agentic AI found their access curtailed. Last year, Anthropic throttled access to Claude Code after the company claimed some users were abusing the system by running it 24/7.
What this does highlight is the disconnect between companies like Google and OpenClaw users. OpenClaw offered many interesting possibilities for creating workflows with agents. However, because it is continually evolving, users may inadvertently run afoul of ToS or rate limits.
Mohan said Google is working to bring the banned users back, but whether this means the company will amend its ToS or figure out a secure connection between OpenClaw agents and Antigravity models remains to be seen.
For developers, the message is clear: the era of “bring your own agent” to a frontier model is ending. Providers are now prioritizing vertically integrated experiences where they can capture 100% of the telemetry and subscription revenue, often at the expense of the open-source interoperability that defined the early days of the LLM boom.
Affected users
Several users said on both the Y Combinator chat boards and X that they no longer had access to their Google accounts after running OpenClaw instances for certain Google products.
Google’s move mirrors a broader industry shift toward “walled garden” agent ecosystems. Earlier this year, Anthropic introduced “client fingerprinting” to ensure that its Claude Code environment remains the exclusive interface for its models, effectively locking out third-party wrappers like OpenClaw. For developers, the message is clear: the era of “bring your own agent” to a frontier model is ending. Providers are now prioritizing vertically integrated experiences where they can capture 100% of the telemetry and subscription revenue, often at the expense of the open-source interoperability that defined the early days of the LLM boom.
Some have said they will no longer use Google or Gemini for their projects. Right now, people who still want to keep using Antigravity will need to wait until Google figures out a way for them to use OpenClaw and access Gemini tokens in a manner Google deems “fair.”
Google DeepMind reiterated that it had only cut access to Antigravity, not to other Google applications.
Conclusion: the enterprise takeaway
For enterprise technical decision-makers, the “Antigravity Ban” serves as a definitive case study in the risks of agentic dependency. As the industry moves from chatbots to autonomous agents, the following realities must now dictate strategy:
-
Platform fragility is the new normal: The sudden lockout of $250/month “Ultra” users proves that even high-paying enterprise customers have little leverage when a provider decides to change its “fair use” definitions. Relying on OAuth-based third-party wrappers for core business logic is now a high-risk gamble.
-
The rise of local-first governance: With OpenClaw moving toward an OpenAI-backed foundation and Google/Anthropic tightening their clouds, enterprises should prioritize agent frameworks that can run “local-first” or within VPCs. The “token loophole” that OpenClaw exploited is being closed; future agentic scale will require direct, high-cost API contracts rather than subsidized consumer seats.
-
Account portability as a requirement: The fact that users “lost access to their Google accounts” underscores the danger of bundling development environments with primary identity providers. Decision-makers should decouple AI development from core corporate identity (SSO) where possible to avoid a single ToS violation paralyzing an entire team’s communications.
Ultimately, the Antigravity incident marks the end of the “Wild West” for AI agents. As Google and OpenAI stake their claims, the enterprise must choose between the stability of the walled garden or the complexity (and cost) of truly independent, self-hosted infrastructure.
Credit: Source link
